<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NanoSapiens &#187; Physics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nanosapiens.net/category/careers/physics-careers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nanosapiens.net</link>
	<description>Science, technology, futurism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:14:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Eyes on Xenon</title>
		<link>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/eyes-on-xenon/</link>
		<comments>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/eyes-on-xenon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jester</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not the Higgs but dark matter is the true Holy Grail of high energy physics, given that only the purest can hope to discover it. For most of the past decade the leader of the quest to detect the dark matter particle has been the CDMS collaboration. Unfortunately, this amounted to setting better and better limits on the interaction strength of dark matter with nucleons, apart from this shadow of a hint of a possibility of two events announced last year. Although CDMS stays in the game and will continue taking data as super-CDMS, it is bound to lose the yellow shirt soon. For the moment, the primary contender is Xenon100 -  a scaled up version of the Xenon10 detector that was in operation in 2006-2007 in Gran Sasso, Italy.<br /><br />Xenon experiments use a completely different detection technology than solid state detectors <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IJ9Q6vV5I/AAAAAAAAAA4/nEVsfnbCB0g/s1600-h/xenon_S12.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 272px; height: 146px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IJ9Q6vV5I/AAAAAAAAAA4/nEVsfnbCB0g/s320/xenon_S12.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5427411449052878738" border="0" /></a>such as CDMS. The detector is filled with xenon in the dual liquid/gas phase.  When a xenon atom gets hit, it reports this fact to experimenters in two different ways. Photons produced when the atom returns from the excited state is promptly registered by the phototubes located around the detector volume. Besides, the electrons ionized from the atom drift slowly in the applied electric field, and they are registered after some delay. It turns out that the ratio of the scintillation (S1) and the ionization (S2) signals is different for nuclear recoils (that are due to WIMPs, once the experiment is shielded from neutrons) and electron recoils (that are due to ubiquitous backgrounds like photons).<br /><br />Thus, by measuring the S1/S2 ratio xenon experiments are able reject most of the background.<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IJYn89OiI/AAAAAAAAAAw/EF_4WE1FQiI/s1600-h/xenon_selfshielding.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 201px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IJYn89OiI/AAAAAAAAAAw/EF_4WE1FQiI/s320/xenon_selfshielding.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5427410819581032994" border="0" /></a> Furthermore, from the two signals and their relative delay it is possible to reconstruct where in the detector volume the hit occurred. Obviously, background events are more likely to occur near the walls of the tank. Therefore making a larger experiment not only increases the probability of registering a dark matter recoil event , but also decreases the background in the central volume - the property referred to as self-shielding. Add to this the good radioactive purity and relative availability of xenon (you just have to smash a lot of lightbulbs), and you understand why big xenon detectors are taking over the field of direct detection.<br /><br />The prototype Xenon10 detector  was not only a proof-of-principle but also a great success story. For some time, Xenon10 was providing the best constraint on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross-section. In fact, it still sets the best limit for the WIMP masses in the 10-50 GeV range, while for larger masses it was later outraced by CDMS. After so much success, the group decided that things are going too smoothly, and set up a huge pillow fight to ease the tension. As a result, Xenon bifurcated into two rival experiments called Xenon and LUX; the latter was banished from sunny Italy into bottomless pits of South Dakota.<br /><br />The two groups continued, each on its own, scaling up the same technology, each facing an orthogonal set of problems. Apparently, Xenon was the first to pull together. Last year <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IKbf8Uz9I/AAAAAAAAABA/nf0uVt1jqEI/s1600-h/xenon_limits.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 264px; height: 197px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IKbf8Uz9I/AAAAAAAAABA/nf0uVt1jqEI/s320/xenon_limits.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5427411968482136018" border="0" /></a>calibrations were made and the physics run is due any time now. According to the official Xenon propaganda, just 40 live days is enough to push the limit on WIMP-nucleon cross section down to 6x$10^{-9}$ picobarns for a 100 GeV WIMP, almost a factor of 10 better than the current CDMS limit of 4x$10^{-8}$. If either of the two events reported by CDMS is really due to dark matter, by this summer we might have a discovery of the century. If not, the quest will continue, with more and more experiments joining in the race. One-ton monster versions of xenon experiments whose sensitivity should reach $10^{-11}$ picobarns are expected in the second half of this decade.<br /><br />So tons of excitement ahead. As soon as first rumors appear, you know where to look ;-)<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-6402771733328051937?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the Higgs but dark matter is the true Holy Grail of high energy physics, given that only the purest can hope to discover it. For most of the past decade the leader of the quest to detect the dark matter particle has been the CDMS collaboration. Unfortunately, this amounted to setting better and better limits on the interaction strength of dark matter with nucleons, apart from this shadow of a hint of a possibility of two events announced last year. Although CDMS stays in the game and will continue taking data as super-CDMS, it is bound to lose the yellow shirt soon. For the moment, the primary contender is Xenon100 &#8211;  a scaled up version of the Xenon10 detector that was in operation in 2006-2007 in Gran Sasso, Italy.</p>
<p>Xenon experiments use a completely different detection technology than solid state detectors <a rel="nofollow" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IJ9Q6vV5I/AAAAAAAAAA4/nEVsfnbCB0g/s1600-h/xenon_S12.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 272px; height: 146px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IJ9Q6vV5I/AAAAAAAAAA4/nEVsfnbCB0g/s320/xenon_S12.jpg" alt="xenon S12 Eyes on Xenonphysics careers" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5427411449052878738" border="0" title="Eyes on Xenon" /></a>such as CDMS. The detector is filled with xenon in the dual liquid/gas phase.  When a xenon atom gets hit, it reports this fact to experimenters in two different ways. Photons produced when the atom returns from the excited state is promptly registered by the phototubes located around the detector volume. Besides, the electrons ionized from the atom drift slowly in the applied electric field, and they are registered after some delay. It turns out that the ratio of the scintillation (S1) and the ionization (S2) signals is different for nuclear recoils (that are due to WIMPs, once the experiment is shielded from neutrons) and electron recoils (that are due to ubiquitous backgrounds like photons).</p>
<p>Thus, by measuring the S1/S2 ratio xenon experiments are able reject most of the background.<a rel="nofollow" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IJYn89OiI/AAAAAAAAAAw/EF_4WE1FQiI/s1600-h/xenon_selfshielding.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 201px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IJYn89OiI/AAAAAAAAAAw/EF_4WE1FQiI/s320/xenon_selfshielding.jpg" alt="xenon selfshielding Eyes on Xenonphysics careers" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5427410819581032994" border="0" title="Eyes on Xenon" /></a> Furthermore, from the two signals and their relative delay it is possible to reconstruct where in the detector volume the hit occurred. Obviously, background events are more likely to occur near the walls of the tank. Therefore making a larger experiment not only increases the probability of registering a dark matter recoil event , but also decreases the background in the central volume &#8211; the property referred to as self-shielding. Add to this the good radioactive purity and relative availability of xenon (you just have to smash a lot of lightbulbs), and you understand why big xenon detectors are taking over the field of direct detection.</p>
<p>The prototype Xenon10 detector  was not only a proof-of-principle but also a great success story. For some time, Xenon10 was providing the best constraint on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross-section. In fact, it still sets the best limit for the WIMP masses in the 10-50 GeV range, while for larger masses it was later outraced by CDMS. After so much success, the group decided that things are going too smoothly, and set up a huge pillow fight to ease the tension. As a result, Xenon bifurcated into two rival experiments called Xenon and LUX; the latter was banished from sunny Italy into bottomless pits of South Dakota.</p>
<p>The two groups continued, each on its own, scaling up the same technology, each facing an orthogonal set of problems. Apparently, Xenon was the first to pull together. Last year <a rel="nofollow" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IKbf8Uz9I/AAAAAAAAABA/nf0uVt1jqEI/s1600-h/xenon_limits.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 264px; height: 197px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_fqaF_pBXjbU/S1IKbf8Uz9I/AAAAAAAAABA/nf0uVt1jqEI/s320/xenon_limits.jpg" alt="xenon limits Eyes on Xenonphysics careers" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5427411968482136018" border="0" title="Eyes on Xenon" /></a>calibrations were made and the physics run is due any time now. According to the official Xenon propaganda, just 40 live days is enough to push the limit on WIMP-nucleon cross section down to 6x$10^{-9}$ picobarns for a 100 GeV WIMP, almost a factor of 10 better than the current CDMS limit of 4x$10^{-8}$. If either of the two events reported by CDMS is really due to dark matter, by this summer we might have a discovery of the century. If not, the quest will continue, with more and more experiments joining in the race. One-ton monster versions of xenon experiments whose sensitivity should reach $10^{-11}$ picobarns are expected in the second half of this decade.</p>
<p>So tons of excitement ahead. As soon as first rumors appear, you know where to look <img src='http://nanosapiens.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt="icon wink Eyes on Xenonphysics careers" class='wp-smiley' title="Eyes on Xenon" />
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-6402771733328051937?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt="2846514233477399562 6402771733328051937?l=resonaances.blogspot Eyes on Xenonphysics careers"  title="Eyes on Xenon" /></div>

<p class="syndicated-attribution"><a href="http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2010/01/eyes-on-xenon.html" rel="nofollow">Original post source</></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/eyes-on-xenon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MMX</title>
		<link>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/mmx/</link>
		<comments>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/mmx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jester</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome back after winter holidays! In the meantime the year 2009 has gone to past along with the whole damn decade. Nobody here is going to shed a tear for the noughties - definitely the most depressing decade in the history of particle physics. It closes the balance with *zero* major experimental discoveries, while particle theory has also produce little to write down in history books. The optimistic conclusion is that from this point things can only get better :-) <br /><br />So what good do I expect in 2010? This year is going to be very special, in that we have two particle accelerators at the high energy frontier. Such a  situation occurs for the first time in my life, I mean life as a physicist. Hopefully not for the last time... <br /><br />All eyes are of course are turned toward the LHC.  After the Baby Hadron Collider (<span style="font-weight: bold;">BHC</span>) phase last year, following the Aborted Hadron Collider (<span style="font-style: italic;">AHC</span>) in 2008, this year the machine enters the difficult Coming-of-age Hadron Collider (<span style="font-style: italic;">CHC</span>) phase. Even though discoveries are highly unlikely at this stage, we will be following with mouths wide open each step toward becoming the full-fledged <span style="font-style: italic;">LHC</span>:  first 7 TeV collisions, first inverse picobarns acquired, first W and Z bosons, and finally first top quarks on the European soil. Meanwhile, the Tevatron does not rust yet.  The most fascinating is of course its quest for the Higgs: what mass range will they exclude, will they see a bump somewhere. And, one never knows, one of its many new physics searches may finally bring exciting results.<br /><br />However, as we already got used to in this century, discoveries are much more likely to literally fall from the sky. End of last of year, the CDMS collaboration decided to go down in flames and announced a detection of statistically insignificant but thought-provoking two scattering events that could be triggered by dark matter particles. This year a much more sensitive dark matter detector called Xenon100 begins taking data. If any of the two CDMS events was really due to dark matter, Xenon100 should grab a discovery by this summer. That is definitely the most awaited result of the year.  <br /><br />Up in the sky, the Fermi gamma-ray telescope is still alive and taking data. This year should bring an answer if the haze - a population of energetic electrons and positrons in the center of the galaxy that is difficult to account for by astrophysical sources - really exists. Moreover, Fermi is continuing its search for subhalos - small satellite galaxies made entirely of dark matter that may glow in gamma rays due to dark matter annihilation. Deeper in space, the Planck satellite is sitting at the Lagrange point L2 and making precise measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background since September last year. If all goes well we should have the first results this year, and we eagerly expect Planck's measurement of the CMB polarization that should greatly surpass in precision the polarization data of its predecessor WMAP. As usual, astrophysics will probably not bring a clear cut fundamental discovery, but may give us something to think about.  <br /><br />So, lots of things to get excited about, lots of rumors to spread. Even if the year 2010 will not turn very fruitful, at least it should not be boring.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-6809329583445197540?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back after winter holidays! In the meantime the year 2009 has gone to past along with the whole damn decade. Nobody here is going to shed a tear for the noughties &#8211; definitely the most depressing decade in the history of particle physics. It closes the balance with *zero* major experimental discoveries, while particle theory has also produce little to write down in history books. The optimistic conclusion is that from this point things can only get better <img src='http://nanosapiens.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt="icon smile MMXphysics careers" class='wp-smiley' title="MMX" />  </p>
<p>So what good do I expect in 2010? This year is going to be very special, in that we have two particle accelerators at the high energy frontier. Such a  situation occurs for the first time in my life, I mean life as a physicist. Hopefully not for the last time&#8230; </p>
<p>All eyes are of course are turned toward the LHC.  After the Baby Hadron Collider (<span style="font-weight: bold;">BHC</span>) phase last year, following the Aborted Hadron Collider (<span style="font-style: italic;">AHC</span>) in 2008, this year the machine enters the difficult Coming-of-age Hadron Collider (<span style="font-style: italic;">CHC</span>) phase. Even though discoveries are highly unlikely at this stage, we will be following with mouths wide open each step toward becoming the full-fledged <span style="font-style: italic;">LHC</span>:  first 7 TeV collisions, first inverse picobarns acquired, first W and Z bosons, and finally first top quarks on the European soil. Meanwhile, the Tevatron does not rust yet.  The most fascinating is of course its quest for the Higgs: what mass range will they exclude, will they see a bump somewhere. And, one never knows, one of its many new physics searches may finally bring exciting results.</p>
<p>However, as we already got used to in this century, discoveries are much more likely to literally fall from the sky. End of last of year, the CDMS collaboration decided to go down in flames and announced a detection of statistically insignificant but thought-provoking two scattering events that could be triggered by dark matter particles. This year a much more sensitive dark matter detector called Xenon100 begins taking data. If any of the two CDMS events was really due to dark matter, Xenon100 should grab a discovery by this summer. That is definitely the most awaited result of the year.  </p>
<p>Up in the sky, the Fermi gamma-ray telescope is still alive and taking data. This year should bring an answer if the haze &#8211; a population of energetic electrons and positrons in the center of the galaxy that is difficult to account for by astrophysical sources &#8211; really exists. Moreover, Fermi is continuing its search for subhalos &#8211; small satellite galaxies made entirely of dark matter that may glow in gamma rays due to dark matter annihilation. Deeper in space, the Planck satellite is sitting at the Lagrange point L2 and making precise measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background since September last year. If all goes well we should have the first results this year, and we eagerly expect Planck&#8217;s measurement of the CMB polarization that should greatly surpass in precision the polarization data of its predecessor WMAP. As usual, astrophysics will probably not bring a clear cut fundamental discovery, but may give us something to think about.  </p>
<p>So, lots of things to get excited about, lots of rumors to spread. Even if the year 2010 will not turn very fruitful, at least it should not be boring.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-6809329583445197540?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt="2846514233477399562 6809329583445197540?l=resonaances.blogspot MMXphysics careers"  title="MMX" /></div>

<p class="syndicated-attribution"><a href="http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2010/01/mmx.html" rel="nofollow">Original post source</></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/mmx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closed for Winter</title>
		<link>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/closed-for-winter/</link>
		<comments>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/closed-for-winter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jester</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another year gone. In history books it will be marked as the year of the first LHC collisions, and in a few years noone will remember that 2.36$\ll$14. Meantime particle theorists have dwelled mostly on the dark side. The great expectations on the part of the Fermi experiment have not been fulfilled so far: their result may contain interesting physics but at the moment they are far from conclusive. The CDMS bubble inflated by certain irresponsible bloggers ;) has burst last week with a loud smack. In short, we remain in darkness.<br /><br />This is the last post this year. While you gobble I vanish into jungle. Will be back next year, with more reckless rumors.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-1258744265041557296?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another year gone. In history books it will be marked as the year of the first LHC collisions, and in a few years noone will remember that 2.36$\ll$14. Meantime particle theorists have dwelled mostly on the dark side. The great expectations on the part of the Fermi experiment have not been fulfilled so far: their result may contain interesting physics but at the moment they are far from conclusive. The CDMS bubble inflated by certain irresponsible bloggers <img src='http://nanosapiens.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt="icon wink Closed for Winterphysics careers" class='wp-smiley' title="Closed for Winter" />  has burst last week with a loud smack. In short, we remain in darkness.</p>
<p>This is the last post this year. While you gobble I vanish into jungle. Will be back next year, with more reckless rumors.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-1258744265041557296?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt="2846514233477399562 1258744265041557296?l=resonaances.blogspot Closed for Winterphysics careers"  title="Closed for Winter" /></div>

<p class="syndicated-attribution"><a href="http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2009/12/closed-for-winter.html" rel="nofollow">Original post source</></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/closed-for-winter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CDMS Live</title>
		<link>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/cdms-live/</link>
		<comments>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/cdms-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jester</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<ul><li>16:41. Welcome to the live commentary from the CDMS seminar starting today at 2pm Pacific time at SLAC. It might be the event of the year, or the flop of the decade. Though most likely it will be a hint of the century.</li><li>16:50 Our seminar room is starting to get packed. The webcast from SLAC will be projected on a big screen.<br /></li><li>17:00. The SLAC seminar has started! The speaker is Jodi Cooley.  </li><li>17:06. Dark matter history. Zwicky, Ruben, rotation curves, bullet clusters. No way around it, we have to suffer through that....</li><li>17:09. There is also a webcast of the Fermilab seminar <a href="http://www-visualmedia.fnal.gov/real/091217CDMSEmbed.htm">here.</a>   They are ahead of SLAC...</li><li>17:12. Now talking at length about WIMPs. Does it mean they see a vanilla-flavor WIMP?</li><li>17:14. A picture of a cow on one of the slides.<br /></li><li>17:15. Fermilab already got to the gamma rejection. We are watching the wrong webcast, booo.</li><li>17:18. Jodi starts describing the CDMS experiment.<br /></li><li>17:20. Previous CDMS results at Fermilab. They're getting close.</li><li>17:30. We switched to the Fermilab talk here in Rutgers. Now the speaker is Lauren Hsu. She seems faster.</li><li>17:35. Very technical details about phonon timing and data quality monitoring.</li><li>17:38. Expected backgrounds. Finally some important details. </li><li>17:39. Estimated  cosmogenic neutron background 0.04, and similarly for radiogenic ones.</li><li>17:40.  Surface event background estimated at 0.6.<br /></li><li>17:45.  They are talking about expected limits. Scaring. They don't have a signal? If there were no signal they would obtain two times better bounds than the last time.<br /></li><li>17:47.  Rumors reaching me, of 2 events at 11 and 15 keV.</li><li>17:49. It's official: 2 events. One at 12 keV,  the other at 15 kev.<br /></li><li>17:49. There are additional 2 events very close to the cut window, approximately at 12 keV.<br /></li><li>17:58. Now discussing the post-unblinding analysis and the statistical significance.<br /></li><li>18:00. Both events were registered on weekends. Grad students having parties?<br /></li><li>18:01. The significance of the signal is less than two sigma.<br /></li><li>18:04. One of the events has something suspicious with the charge pulse. A long discussion unfolds.<br /></li><li>18:12. After post-unblinding analysis the signal significance drops to 1.5sigma (23 percent probability of the background fluctuation).<br /></li><li>18:14. The new limits on dark matter $4x10^{-44} cm^2$ for a 70 GeV WIMP. Slightly better (factor 1.5) than the last ones.<br /></li><li>18:17. Inelastic dark matter interpretation of the DAMA signal  is not excluded by the new CDMS data.</li><li>18:18. Nearing the end. The speaker discusses super-CDMS, the possible future upgrade of the experiment.<br /></li><li>18:20. Summarizing, no discovery. Just a hint of a signal but with a very low statistical significance. Was fun anyway.<br /></li><li>18:20. So much for now. Good night and good luck. The first theory papers should appear on Monday.</li></ul>A summary by CDMS <a href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/results_summary.pdf">here</a>, and the paper <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3592">here</a> (on Arxiv password-protected untill Sunday evening; if you can't wait  click <a href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/0912.3592v1.pdf">here</a>).  See also a much better <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/17/dark-matter-detected-or-not-live-blogging-the-seminar/">live commentary</a> from eye-witnesses on Cosmic Variance.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-8486732510566046441?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>16:41. Welcome to the live commentary from the CDMS seminar starting today at 2pm Pacific time at SLAC. It might be the event of the year, or the flop of the decade. Though most likely it will be a hint of the century.</li>
<li>16:50 Our seminar room is starting to get packed. The webcast from SLAC will be projected on a big screen.</li>
<li>17:00. The SLAC seminar has started! The speaker is Jodi Cooley.  </li>
<li>17:06. Dark matter history. Zwicky, Ruben, rotation curves, bullet clusters. No way around it, we have to suffer through that&#8230;.</li>
<li>17:09. There is also a webcast of the Fermilab seminar <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www-visualmedia.fnal.gov/real/091217CDMSEmbed.htm">here.</a>   They are ahead of SLAC&#8230;</li>
<li>17:12. Now talking at length about WIMPs. Does it mean they see a vanilla-flavor WIMP?</li>
<li>17:14. A picture of a cow on one of the slides.</li>
<li>17:15. Fermilab already got to the gamma rejection. We are watching the wrong webcast, booo.</li>
<li>17:18. Jodi starts describing the CDMS experiment.</li>
<li>17:20. Previous CDMS results at Fermilab. They&#8217;re getting close.</li>
<li>17:30. We switched to the Fermilab talk here in Rutgers. Now the speaker is Lauren Hsu. She seems faster.</li>
<li>17:35. Very technical details about phonon timing and data quality monitoring.</li>
<li>17:38. Expected backgrounds. Finally some important details. </li>
<li>17:39. Estimated  cosmogenic neutron background 0.04, and similarly for radiogenic ones.</li>
<li>17:40.  Surface event background estimated at 0.6.</li>
<li>17:45.  They are talking about expected limits. Scaring. They don&#8217;t have a signal? If there were no signal they would obtain two times better bounds than the last time.</li>
<li>17:47.  Rumors reaching me, of 2 events at 11 and 15 keV.</li>
<li>17:49. It&#8217;s official: 2 events. One at 12 keV,  the other at 15 kev.</li>
<li>17:49. There are additional 2 events very close to the cut window, approximately at 12 keV.</li>
<li>17:58. Now discussing the post-unblinding analysis and the statistical significance.</li>
<li>18:00. Both events were registered on weekends. Grad students having parties?</li>
<li>18:01. The significance of the signal is less than two sigma.</li>
<li>18:04. One of the events has something suspicious with the charge pulse. A long discussion unfolds.</li>
<li>18:12. After post-unblinding analysis the signal significance drops to 1.5sigma (23 percent probability of the background fluctuation).</li>
<li>18:14. The new limits on dark matter $4&#215;10^{-44} cm^2$ for a 70 GeV WIMP. Slightly better (factor 1.5) than the last ones.</li>
<li>18:17. Inelastic dark matter interpretation of the DAMA signal  is not excluded by the new CDMS data.</li>
<li>18:18. Nearing the end. The speaker discusses super-CDMS, the possible future upgrade of the experiment.</li>
<li>18:20. Summarizing, no discovery. Just a hint of a signal but with a very low statistical significance. Was fun anyway.</li>
<li>18:20. So much for now. Good night and good luck. The first theory papers should appear on Monday.</li>
</ul>
<p>A summary by CDMS <a rel="nofollow" href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/results_summary.pdf">here</a>, and the paper <a rel="nofollow" href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3592">here</a> (on Arxiv password-protected untill Sunday evening; if you can&#8217;t wait  click <a rel="nofollow" href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/0912.3592v1.pdf">here</a>).  See also a much better <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/12/17/dark-matter-detected-or-not-live-blogging-the-seminar/">live commentary</a> from eye-witnesses on Cosmic Variance.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-8486732510566046441?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt="2846514233477399562 8486732510566046441?l=resonaances.blogspot CDMS Livephysics careers"  title="CDMS Live" /></div>

<p class="syndicated-attribution"><a href="http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2009/12/cdms-live.html" rel="nofollow">Original post source</></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/02/careers/physics-careers/cdms-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A little update on CDMS</title>
		<link>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/01/careers/physics-careers/a-little-update-on-cdms/</link>
		<comments>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/01/careers/physics-careers/a-little-update-on-cdms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jester</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I owe you a short summary to straighten out what I messed up. This Thursday CDMS is going to announce their new results on dark matter detection based on the 2008 and 2009 runs. The collaboration has scheduled two simultaneous talks, one in Fermilab and one in SLAC, for 5pm Eastern time (23:00 in Europe).  The SLAC talk will be webcasted <a href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/">here.</a> An ArXiv paper is also promised, and it will probably get <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_xEaWDp7BS1Q/Sygoqc3y6mI/AAAAAAAAAns/-EamJ8mHVNk/s1600-h/cdms_puck.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 278px; height: 204px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_xEaWDp7BS1Q/Sygoqc3y6mI/AAAAAAAAAns/-EamJ8mHVNk/s320/cdms_puck.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5415623261682854498" border="0" /></a>posted Thursday evening. These facts are based on the news from the official <a href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/">CDMS page</a>, so they may turn out to be facts after all, unlike the previous facts I called facts even though they were unfacts :-)<br /><br />Having rendered unto Caesar, I can go on indulging in completely unfounded speculations. It is pretty clear that no discovery will be announced this week, in the formal scientific sense of the word "discovery". Earlier expectations of a discovery that I was reporting on were based on the rumors of a CDMS paper accepted in Nature, which turned out to be completely false.<br />Moreover, some CDMS members seem to <a href="http://physicsworld.com/blog/2009/12/the_dark_matter_rumour_mill.html">play down the hopes</a>.  But the secrecy surrounding the announcement of the new results may suggest that CDMS has seen at least a hint of a signal:<br />not enough for a 3 sigma evidence, but enough to send us all into an excited state.<br /><br />So I see two possible scenarios:<br /><ul><li><span style="font-style: italic;">Scenario #1</span><br />CDMS has detected 2-3 events with the expected background of order 0.5.  All eyes will turn to XENON100 - a more sensitive direct detection experiment that is kicking off as we speak - who should provide the definitive answer by the next summer. In the meantime, theorists will produce a zillion of papers fitting their favorite recoil spectrum to the 3 events.  </li><li><span style="font-style: italic;">Scenario #2 </span><br />All this secrecy was just smoke and mirrors. CDMS has found 0 or 1 events, thus setting the best bounds so far on the dark matter-nucleon cross section. Given the expectations they raised in the physics community, the Thursday speakers will be torn to pieces by an angry mob, and their bones will be thrown to undergrads.<br /></li></ul>It's fifty-fifty: either they have seen dark matter or they have not ;-) We'll see in 2 days, stay tuned.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-2924835993550117049?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I owe you a short summary to straighten out what I messed up. This Thursday CDMS is going to announce their new results on dark matter detection based on the 2008 and 2009 runs. The collaboration has scheduled two simultaneous talks, one in Fermilab and one in SLAC, for 5pm Eastern time (23:00 in Europe).  The SLAC talk will be webcasted <a rel="nofollow" href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/">here.</a> An ArXiv paper is also promised, and it will probably get <a rel="nofollow" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_xEaWDp7BS1Q/Sygoqc3y6mI/AAAAAAAAAns/-EamJ8mHVNk/s1600-h/cdms_puck.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 278px; height: 204px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_xEaWDp7BS1Q/Sygoqc3y6mI/AAAAAAAAAns/-EamJ8mHVNk/s320/cdms_puck.jpg" alt="cdms puck A little update on CDMSphysics careers" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5415623261682854498" border="0" title="A little update on CDMS" /></a>posted Thursday evening. These facts are based on the news from the official <a rel="nofollow" href="http://cdms.berkeley.edu/">CDMS page</a>, so they may turn out to be facts after all, unlike the previous facts I called facts even though they were unfacts <img src='http://nanosapiens.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt="icon smile A little update on CDMSphysics careers" class='wp-smiley' title="A little update on CDMS" /> </p>
<p>Having rendered unto Caesar, I can go on indulging in completely unfounded speculations. It is pretty clear that no discovery will be announced this week, in the formal scientific sense of the word &#8220;discovery&#8221;. Earlier expectations of a discovery that I was reporting on were based on the rumors of a CDMS paper accepted in Nature, which turned out to be completely false.<br />Moreover, some CDMS members seem to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://physicsworld.com/blog/2009/12/the_dark_matter_rumour_mill.html">play down the hopes</a>.  But the secrecy surrounding the announcement of the new results may suggest that CDMS has seen at least a hint of a signal:<br />not enough for a 3 sigma evidence, but enough to send us all into an excited state.</p>
<p>So I see two possible scenarios:
<ul>
<li><span style="font-style: italic;">Scenario #1</span><br />CDMS has detected 2-3 events with the expected background of order 0.5.  All eyes will turn to XENON100 &#8211; a more sensitive direct detection experiment that is kicking off as we speak &#8211; who should provide the definitive answer by the next summer. In the meantime, theorists will produce a zillion of papers fitting their favorite recoil spectrum to the 3 events.  </li>
<li><span style="font-style: italic;">Scenario #2 </span><br />All this secrecy was just smoke and mirrors. CDMS has found 0 or 1 events, thus setting the best bounds so far on the dark matter-nucleon cross section. Given the expectations they raised in the physics community, the Thursday speakers will be torn to pieces by an angry mob, and their bones will be thrown to undergrads.</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s fifty-fifty: either they have seen dark matter or they have not <img src='http://nanosapiens.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt="icon wink A little update on CDMSphysics careers" class='wp-smiley' title="A little update on CDMS" />  We&#8217;ll see in 2 days, stay tuned.
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2846514233477399562-2924835993550117049?l=resonaances.blogspot.com' alt="2846514233477399562 2924835993550117049?l=resonaances.blogspot A little update on CDMSphysics careers"  title="A little update on CDMS" /></div>

<p class="syndicated-attribution"><a href="http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2009/12/little-update-on-cdms.html" rel="nofollow">Original post source</></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanosapiens.net/2012/01/careers/physics-careers/a-little-update-on-cdms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

